Abstract
This article will address the use of TikTok as a political communication tool in Jorge Álvarez Máynez's presidential campaign in the 2024 Mexican elections. In a context of apathy toward traditional politics and the exponential growth of social media, TikTok is emerging as one of the main platforms in the electoral battlefield, where more than competing for ideas, it's competing for the attention of young audiences. Theoretical Foundation: The research is based on contributions from digital political communication, emotional technopolitics, and algorithm theory. Authors such as Castells (2009), Gerbaudo (2018, 2022), Cervi, Tejedor and Blesa (2023) and Rodríguez (2025) explain how digital environments reconfigure the political map, privileging aesthetics, charisma and virality over programmatic argumentation. Methodology: A qualitative content analysis was carried out on thirty videos officially published on Máynez's account, between March and May 2024. The speeches, performative elements, musical and humorous resources, as well as citizen interaction were studied, paying special attention to user reception and participation. Results: The campaign was characterized by a strategic and intensive use of the platform, with visual and emotional narratives that generated high levels of interaction. In a poorly regulated electoral environment, Máynez achieved an
unprecedented communication advantage, driven by algorithms that favored performative and emotional discourses, giving her disproportionate visibility compared to her opponents. Conclusion: TikTok doesn't democratize, but rather personalizes; it doesn't equalize but fragments; and far from strengthening democratic deliberation, it displaces it toward an attention market dominated by algorithmic logic.
References
Casero-Ripollés A, López-López PC. The Routledge Handbook of Political Communication in Ibero-America. Taylor & Francis; 2024.
Hendricks JA, Schill D. The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election and Social Media and Trump: Fomenting Controversy and Distrust in the Democratic System. Social Media Politics, Routledge; 2024.
Deslandes SF, Ferreira VS. Connective Embodied Activism of Young Brazilian and Portuguese Social Media Influencers. Youth 2025;5:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5010028.
Rincón O, Uribe-Rincón C. Political communication in Latin America. The Routledge Handbook of Political Communication in Ibero-America, Routledge; 2024.
Casero-Ripollés A, López-López PC. The Routledge Handbook of Political Communication in Ibero-America. Taylor & Francis; 2024.
Tienda CDR, Maya AF. Likes are not votes: Critical analysis of the influence of electoral campaigns onTikTok in relation to the results of the presidential election, Mexico 2024. Multidisciplinar (Montevideo) 2024;2:119–119. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu2024119.
Salinas LAC, Eugenia VMM, Vela JAP, Pérez EB. The impact of political candidates’ TikTok campaigns on youth emotions in Ecuador’s local elections. Ibero-American Journal of Education & Society Research 2025;5:e25003–e25003. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v5i1.707.
Kreiss D, Neill L. Platforms and Global Democracies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, n.d.
Páez M, Alejandro Y. Comunicación política digital empleada por el candidato Rodolfo Hernández durante la primera vuelta de las elecciones presidenciales de 2022 2025.
Ibáñez DB, Castro LM, Espinosa A, Puentes-Rivera I, López-López PC. Communication and Applied Technologies: Proceedings of ICOMTA 2023. Springer Nature; 2024.
Pinto G, Bickham C, Salkar T, Menezes J, Luceri L, Ferrara E. Tracking the 2024 US Presidential Election Chatter on TikTok: A Public Multimodal Dataset. Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2025, p. 773–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3701716.3715291.
Montúfar Á, Atarama-Rojas T, Saavedra-Chau G. Digital political campaigns in social media: The first round of Peru’s 2021 general elections. Elections and Social Networks around the World, Routledge; 2024.
Gerbaudo P, Moreno I. The Moving Body as the Articulator, Meme and Affective Link in Political Communication on TikTok. In: Pérez Rastrilla L, Sapag M. P, Recio García A, editors. Fast Politics: Propaganda in the Age of TikTok, Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023, p. 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5110-9_2.
Prado MCR, Coello KLB. Communication Strategies on TikTok During the 2021 Ecuadorian Presidential Election. In: Pérez Rastrilla L, Sapag M. P, Recio García A, editors. Fast Politics: Propaganda in the Age of TikTok, Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023, p. 103–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5110-9_6.
Salazar A. Scrolling Politics in the Politainment Era. In: Pérez Rastrilla L, Sapag M. P, Recio García A, editors. Fast Politics: Propaganda in the Age of TikTok, Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023, p. 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5110-9_3.
Sapag M. P, Rastrilla LP, García AR. TikTok: New Media, Old Propaganda—State of the Art and Possibilities for Political Communication. In: Pérez Rastrilla L, Sapag M. P, Recio García A, editors. Fast Politics: Propaganda in the Age of TikTok, Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023, p. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5110-9_1.
Angulo Moncayo N, López-Paredes M, Rodriguez-Malebran C, Sandoval Pizarro T. The Discursive Strategies of Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa on the Platforms Instagram and TikTok. Social Sciences 2025;14:572. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100572.
Çakici Z. TikTok as a Political Communication Medium: An Examination of the United Nations. Journal of Communication Theory & Research / Iletisim Kuram ve Arastirma Dergisi 2025;69:136. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1580671.
Herrero-Izquierdo J, Reguero-Sanz I, Berdón-Prieto P. Metodología y Caracterización del Criptodiscurso de Odio entre Partidos Políticos: TikTok en Campaña Electoral. VISUAL REVIEW International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual 2025;17:99–109. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.5309.
Battista D, Petrone A. Communication Strategies and Online Political Attack: TikTok as a Global Electoral Battleground. Review of Human Rights 2025;11:1–29. https://doi.org/10.35994/rhr.v11i1.280.
Ramírez Plascencia D, Ochoa Zuno Á, Alonzo González RM. Digital partisans: An inquiry on the use of bots for political propaganda in Mexico. Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales 2025;22:175–84.
Alamri, A., Bena, R., Katili, M., & Tabo, P. (2023). Digital divides and political participation in the Global South. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.000000
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Brändle, V., Galpin, C., & Trenz, H. J. (2022). Digital democracy: Practices and concepts in a changing media environment. Routledge.
Cedrún, P., & Civila, S. (2024). Political discourse on TikTok: Between immediacy and simplification. Comunicar, 32(74), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2024-05
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Mejías, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Ekoh, P. C., & Elizabeth, I. (2021). Social media, digital inequality and political participation. Journal of African Media Studies, 13(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00045_1
Floridi, L. (2020). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Sage.
Gorokhovskaia, Y., Shahbaz, A., & Slipowitz, A. (2023). Freedom on the net 2023: The repressive power of artificial intelligence. Freedom House.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. MIT Press.
Herrman, J. (2023, March 23). TikTok’s political moment in the United States. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Marlina, R., & Hakim, A. (2025). TikTok and youth participation in Indonesia’s 2024 elections. Asian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2025.000000
Mazzoleni, G., & Sfardini, A. (2009). Politainment: Political communication and entertainment in democracy. Peter Lang.
McGregor, S. C. (2020). Social media as a public opinion thermometer: An evaluation. Political Communication, 37(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Qualitative research methodology. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Orrantia, R. (2022). Digital consultants and the viralization of political discourse. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, 34(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2022.34
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Pratama, Y., Yuliani, S., & Taufiq, R. (2024). Youth, TikTok, and political participation in Southeast Asia. Journal of Youth Studies, 27(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.000000
Recuero, R., Soares, F., Gruzd, A., & Barbosa, H. (2022). Polarization and the spread of disinformation in Brazil: The case of WhatsApp and TikTok. Social Media
+ Society, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086323
Revolusi, A. (2023). Political memes on TikTok: Between humor and mobilization.
Media and Communication, 11(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.
Ruhyat, A., & Wahidin, D. (2024). Algorithmic bubbles and polarization on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society, 27(6), 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.000000
Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Tienda, M., & Maya, J. (2024). Likes no son votos: TikTok y campañas políticas en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 69(246), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2024.246
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Valle-Cruz, D., Sandoval-Almazán, R., López-Chau, A., & Criado, J. I. (2024). Algorithmic polarization in Latin American elections. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101118
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Vijay, D., & Gekker, A. (2021). Playing politics: How TikTok users engage with political content. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2362–2380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1843374
Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo,
K. (2022). Media literacy in the age of algorithms: Empowering citizens for critical participation. Computers & Education, 182, 104463.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
Wu, T. (2016). The attention merchants: The epic scramble to get inside our heads. Vintage.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yolier Izquierdo Cuellar, Carlos Daniel Hernández Orozco (Author)